"please send emailto recieve full letter I sent certified mail and the response showing that these judges are in R.I.C.O. Conspiracy Aginst Rights and OUR JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT HAS BECOME ENEMIES TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION COMMITTING…"
"February 25, 2015
Judicial Conference Committee on
Judicial Conduct and Disability
Administrative Office of the
United States Courts
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544
Attention: Office Of General Counsel
In Re Complaint of Judicial…"
"Okay, I was pulled over illegaly for driving on suspended license and officers committed Official Misconduct so I filed Criminal charges on them and demanded to have jury trialand proceed pro-se...Judge kunkle got angry and stated i needed to be…"
"I just searched on this site for "Rule 1.6" without a result. This is an issue that it is crucial for this group to address. Please visit the Facebook page "Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6" for the complete story. Rule 1.6…"
please send emailto recieve full letter I sent certified mail and the response showing that these judges are in R.I.C.O. Conspiracy Aginst Rights and OUR JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT HAS BECOME ENEMIES TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION COMMITTING TREASON AND R.I.C.O. CRIMES AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.
No. 07-14-90102 (7th Circuit Judicial Council Dec. 9, 2014)
I Carlos L. Massey, hereby Petitions the United States Judicial Conference Committee pursuant to Article VI rule 21 of the rules adopted March 11,2008 for Judicial-Conduct. Rule 21 (a) states that “The Judicial Conference of the United States may in its sole discretion review any such Committee decision, but a complainant does not have a right to this review”, however “The Supremacy Claus of Article VI of the United States Constitution” which all judges are bound, makes invalid any dismissal of a complaint based upon violations of guarantees of the United States Constitution and United States Codes. Federal Mandatory Duties and the Oaths sworn by the judges require this Petition to be reviewed.
Rulings in Marbury V. Madison’, determined that the federal courts; As part of their inherent duty to interpret and apply the Constitution and to decide whether a federal or State statue conflicts with the Constitution. All Judges are bound to follow the Constitution and treat the conflicting statues as unenforceable.
This Petition For Review is due to Chief Judge Diane P. Wood Memorandum dismissing the complaint filed for the third time on December 1, 2014. Chief Judge Diane P. Wood sent the memorandum on December 9, 2014 (No. 07-14-90102) stating in part; “Although the complaint does contain serious allegations against the judge, there is nothing that establishes any judicial misconduct by the judge” “Therefore the complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec 352(a)(1)(A)iii
It is the mandatory duty of the judges who are members of the judicial Conference Committee to take Judicial Notice of Law and acknowledge that they are now bound by the Supremacy Claus of the United States Constitution, therefore the rules and procedures set forth by the Breyer Committee are now moot. It is the Mandatory Duty of said judges to provide the Right to Equal Protection of the Law and Enforce The Supreme Law of the Land.
Okay, I was pulled over illegaly for driving on suspended license and officers committed Official Misconduct so I filed Criminal charges on them and demanded to have jury trialand proceed pro-se...Judge kunkle got angry and stated i needed to be determined if i was fit to stand trial and he without the required Bona fide doubt ordered me to be sent to a Maximum Security Mental facility in downstate Illinois which cost the tax payers over $250,000.00 were I never received any Psycosis observed or psyc drugs but I was threatend that if i want to go home i better learn how to play ball and quit writing federal and State Officials, after being threatened to be forced drugged when I filed a complaint on the staff for attacking one of the real mental patients, I told Mark truhee the director ok I would cop out to a plea deal since I had already served 312 days there and I would have to be released...they sent me to Brigveiw court and I TOLD THE JUDGE I DEMAND SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS AND I WILL NOT PLEA GUILTY!!! The judge two days later called me back to court and the State Nolle Prosiqui the case but they reported it as a conviction and I have the documentation. State law required that I be compensated for this detainment but I filed for a Petition for Certificate of Innocence and the same judge heard the case in violation of circuit court rules which is Official Misconduct and Fraud upon the Court and Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law.While pursuing these issues before federal court along with a Bivens action against the federal judge for denying Habeas Corpus, I was Injured due to a federal judges denial of SSI benefits (which has now been approved yesterday) and my foot was scheduled for surgery from injury however the day of ssurgery I was picked up and in court because I WAS AGAIN PICKED UP FORDRIVINGON SUSPENDED LICENSE!!! Judge Flarretywas told in court record by motions and before open court that I was being tortured and denied Medicalattention to foot and for seizures and he said if I want my foot fixed take the plea and I can gohave my foot fixed... I have extensive records for youto see including documentation from Illinois Attorny General tellingme that if I pay her $2000.00she willget to the bottom of my issues... My Number is 708 574-7421 My issues are Now before the governors office and the US Admininstrative Office of the Courts Flat out refused to investigate my well documented case and this is federal crimes under USC Titles 18 sec.2, 4, 241, 242, 245 and 1001 I can answer any questions more efficiently either by phone or email firstname.lastname@example.org
I just searched on this site for "Rule 1.6" without a result. This is an issue that it is crucial for this group to address. Please visit the Facebook page "Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6" for the complete story. Rule 1.6 is the ultimate "Catch-22" which prevents, by law (albeit an illegally-established law, created without the participation of the legislative or executive branches of government) any member of the Bar from addressing, let alone correcting, judicial wrongdoing or corruption.
mr jackson i googled the title you asked me to and all i got was a lot of posts on facebook my direct e-mail is email@example.com feel free to contact me as i have allready got a law suit in the apellate courts and your case might help me prove a clear pattern of abuse and some of the laws i have researched might help you in your case.